Local SIC: Difference between revisions
Tag: Manual revert |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Note: this page is visible to public | ===Note: this page is visible to public=== | ||
The local self-interaction correction (LSIC) method is a new SIC method for addressing the limitation of PZSIC. Although PZSIC is an exact theory for one-electron SIE removal, it often worsens the good performance of density functional approximations. LSIC corrects this by scaling down SIC in many-electron regions. | The local self-interaction correction (LSIC) method is a new SIC method for addressing the limitation of PZSIC. Although PZSIC is an exact theory for one-electron SIE removal, it often worsens the good performance of density functional approximations. LSIC corrects this by scaling down SIC in many-electron regions. | ||
Revision as of 01:00, 15 November 2022
Note: this page is visible to public
The local self-interaction correction (LSIC) method is a new SIC method for addressing the limitation of PZSIC. Although PZSIC is an exact theory for one-electron SIE removal, it often worsens the good performance of density functional approximations. LSIC corrects this by scaling down SIC in many-electron regions.
PZSIC equation
This is a one-electron self-interaction correction scheme and is exact self-interaction cancellation for one electron cases. PZSIC is nearly many-electron SIE-free.
LSIC equation
Reference: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/figure/10.1063/1.5129533
In the local SIC method, PZSIC energy densities are scaled down with a local scaling factor or iso-orbital indicator z(r).
where
A typical choice for the local scaling factor is
This quantity becomes unity at the single orbital regions and becomes zero at the uniform density regions. It cannot differentiate weak interaction regions and uniform density regions.
Quasi-SCF approach
You can apply the local scaling to PZSIC potentials in place of PZSIC energy densities. This approach is referred to as quasi-SCF. The resulting Hamiltonian is as follows,
The quasi-SCF approach gives better HOMO (closer agreement with NIST IPs) than the original LSIC. But have problems in the spin crossover systems(?).
Gauge problem
With LSIC with PBE or SCAN, the XC energy gauge differs from the Coulomb gauge.
Successes of LSIC method
Static dipole polarizability
Static dipole polarizabilities in DFA are often overestimated because of notorious delocalization errors. Application of PZSIC localizes density, but the polarizabilities are then underestimated. Here, PZSIC potentials are locally scaled down (quasi-SCF)
Water clusters
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0025601
Polyacenes
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0041265
Molecules polarizability (132 molecules from data set of Hait and Head-Gordon)
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/cp/d0cp06512a
Exchange coupling constant
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c10354
In exchange coupling calculations, PZSIC localizes densities responsible for magnetic interactions. Many DFAs and PZSIC-DFAs show a system-dependent, mixed performance whereas LSIC performance seems consistent.
Reaction barrier height
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0070893
LSIC works very well for hydrogen transfer types of reaction barriers.
Anion
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/cp#!issueid=cp022007&type=current&issnprint=1463-9076
https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR20/Session/J58.10
LSIC method was also applied to determine the vertical detachment energies of water cluster anion. This was done in two ways: 1. by taking the energy difference of an anion and a neutral water cluster and 2. from the highest occupied orbital eigenvalues. We find perturbative LSIC performs better than MP2, and quasi-SCF LSIC shows comparable to MP2 level of theory.
